Download E-books Marx and Whitehead: Process, Dialectics, and the Critique of Capitalism (Suny Series in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences) PDF

By Anne Fairchild Pomeroy

Marx and Whitehead boldly asks us to re-examine capitalism, no longer purely as an economy yet as a essentially self-destructive mode that, via its very nature and operation, undermines the cohesive textile of human lifestyles. writer Anne Fairchild Pomeroy asserts that it truly is most unlikely to understand absolutely the influence of Marx s critique of capitalism with out figuring out the philosophical approach that underlies it. Alfred North Whitehead s paintings is used to forge a scientific hyperlink among strategy philosophy and dialectical materialism through the class of creation. Whitehead s technique idea brings Marx s philosophical imaginative and prescient into sharper concentration. This union presents the grounds for Pomeroy s declare that the center of Marx s critique of capitalism is essentially ontological, and that consequently the required situation for actual human flourishing lies in overcoming the capitalist type of social relations."

Show description

Read Online or Download Marx and Whitehead: Process, Dialectics, and the Critique of Capitalism (Suny Series in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences) PDF

Best Communism Socialism books

Modernism and British Socialism

Thomas Linehan bargains a clean viewpoint on overdue Victorian and Edwardian socialism through studying the socialist revival of those years from the point of view of modernism. In so doing, he explores the modernist venture as extending past the troubles of the literary and creative avant-garde to include political and social hobbies.

A Darwinian Left: Politics, Evolution, and Cooperation

During this ground-breaking ebook, a popular bioethicist argues that the political left needs to noticeably revise its superseded view of human nature. He indicates how the insights of recent evolutionary thought, fairly at the evolution of cooperation, might help the left reach its social and political ambitions. Singer explains why the left initially rejected Darwinian notion and why those purposes aren't any longer plausible.

Additional info for Marx and Whitehead: Process, Dialectics, and the Critique of Capitalism (Suny Series in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences)

Show sample text content

Are stipulations appertaining to their individuality, under no circumstances exterior to them; stipulations less than which those certain participants, residing lower than sure relationships, can by myself produce their fabric existence and what's hooked up with it, are therefore the stipulations in their self-activity and are produced by means of this self-activity. (GI, 87) members generating in society—hence socially made up our minds person production—is, after all, the purpose of departure. (italics mine) (G, eighty three) eventually, the efficient job itself turns into part of the given global through its objectification. hence, like Whitehead, Marx’s effective everyone is concurrently made up our minds and loose, topic and superject, person and relational, deepest and public, and so on. The circulate of background is the efficient iteration of novelty from the given then objectified as a brand new comprehensive given for appropriation. Pin down anybody second, cease the method, fail to remember the required circulate, and your research might be incomplete, 60 MARX AND WHITEHEAD one-sided, undialectical. you are going to both take decision to be determinism or effective capability to intend limitless freedom. nor is sufficient; either are incomplete. The likely contradictory moments are united within the area that's the processive flow of existence itself. This notion of background relies on our skill to expound the true strategy of construction, beginning out from the fabric creation of existence itself, and to realize the shape of sex attached with this and created by means of this mode of construction . . . because the foundation of all historical past. (GI, fifty eight) It indicates . . . that during [history] at each one degree there's discovered a fabric outcome: a sum of effective forces, and traditionally created relation of people to nature and to each other, that is passed all the way down to every one iteration from its predecessor; a mass of effective forces . . . which, at the one hand, is certainly transformed through the hot iteration, but in addition at the different prescribes for it its stipulations of lifestyles and provides it a distinct improvement, a different personality. It exhibits that conditions make males simply up to males make situations. (GI, fifty nine) this is often definitely just a initial dialogue of this subject and person who can't be accurately accomplished until eventually i've got provided what particularly human, awake effective task includes when it comes to inventive addition to the appropriated international. in spite of the fact that, it does supply vital clues as to how the processive philosophy operative inside of Marx’s class of construction, is sensible of the claims of ways efficient task is “determined” via and “determines” fabric stipulations. hence there are at the least 3 assorted notwithstanding interlocking ways that Marx’s idea of construction is functionally similar to Whitehead’s class of technique. 1. either Marx and Whitehead use their respective phrases to refer either to the overall summary personality of all effective processive job and to any particular concrete example or second of that task. 2. creation and technique either confer with and serve to explicate the flow of turning into that's the temporal or old international and achieve this via a markedly comparable constitution of appropriation/prehension, effective activity/prehensive valuation, objectification/superjective being.

Rated 4.77 of 5 – based on 42 votes